Excavating
Monument B3
Since
its discovery in 1998 during mechanical terracing work, three excavation
steps were made on B3. The first was a manual clearing of debris laying
over a quadrangular stone surface, which was done by the RNR-RC team
short after discovery. The cleared surface was photographed and roughly
described (Fig. 10). The results led to a preliminary report (RNR-RC /
Helvetas 1999) and to the later archaeological investigations by the
SLFA team.
Fig.
10
The
second step was the investigation we made in April 1999 to determine the
exact shape of the stone structure, its integration within the surrounding
sediment deposits, and eventually to discover samples for dating the
structure. At the end of our first excavation, the structure had the shape
of a trapezoidal platform built on a sloping ground. Although the platform
showed an almost flat surface, it appeared that the stones of its surface
center were marked by strong centripetal sloping angles, position which
formed a clear depression. This indicated that the platform once contained
a covered hollow volume, or chamber, which collapsed in the course of
time. The archaeological documentation gathered in 1999 led to a site
characterization in our preliminary report (Blumer and Vial 1999), which
served to plan the next excavation steps.
Between
April and July 2000, it clearly appeared that one of the planed new
buildings was directly competing its location with the old stone platform,
thus creating a conflict situation. The excavation 2000 was intended to
resolve this problem by achieving a full structural and archaeological
documentation of the platform, which would then have been removed to leave
the spot to the modern construction. In the course of the excavation, it
appeared that the monument did not only consist of the trapezoidal stone
platform of limited surface uncovered in 1999, but also of a surrounding
retaining wall of very large dimension and identical trapezoidal shape.
From this point, it was clear that we had to invest supplementary time to
follow and uncover the newly found superstructure, and this activity took
most of our working time in 2000. It was even necessary to extend the
campaign duration for one month in order to achieve most of the excavation
work.
At
campaign’s end, certain portions had not been described in full details
(stone by stone, small scale), due to the short investigation time. We
estimate that in western context, such large monument would have
necessitated at least twice the excavation time to be fully processed. It
is nevertheless possible today to give a clear picture of the monument
with help of the documentation we gathered.